EuroComply
Créer un compte

EuroComply vs Drata

Drata automates evidence collection and monitoring for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and other compliance frameworks. It integrates with cloud infrastructure to continuously monitor compliance posture.

EuroComply vs Drata — what is the difference?

EuroComply and Drata serve different compliance needs. EuroComply is built exclusively for EU SMEs, hosted on EU infrastructure (Frankfurt), powered by Mistral AI, and covers 20+ EU regulations including the AI Act — without CLOUD Act exposure. Drata is US-only, meaning customer data is subject to US surveillance law. SaaS companies needing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certification.

  • Full EU regulation coverage (AI Act, NIS2, DORA, CRA, GDPR)
  • 100% EU data residency — no transatlantic transfers
  • EU AI models (Mistral) — no US AI dependency
  • Free tier for evaluation
Schrems II exposure (EuroComply)Sovereign (score: 8 — EU-only entity)
Schrems II exposure (Drata)US-Only (score: 88)
EuroComply pricing€0 — €399/mo
Drata pricingStarting from ~$10,000/year
Source: EuroComply research, public sources (2026-05)Reviewed:

EuroComply

EU Compliance OS for SMEs

Pricing: €0 — €399/mo

For: EU SMEs (10-500 employees)

Full EU regulation coverage (AI Act, NIS2, DORA, CRA, GDPR)
100% EU data residency — no transatlantic transfers
EU AI models (Mistral) — no US AI dependency
Free tier for evaluation
Built for regulatory compliance, not just certifications
Sovereignty audit included

Drata

Compliance automation for SOC 2 and ISO 27001

Pricing: Starting from ~$10,000/year

For: SaaS companies needing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certification

Strengths

Excellent SOC 2 automation
Continuous compliance monitoring
Wide integration ecosystem
Strong audit trail

Limitations

US-headquartered with US data processing
Limited EU regulation coverage (no AI Act, NIS2, DORA)
Focused on certifications, not EU regulatory compliance
Expensive for small companies

EuroComply vs Drata: what's the difference?

Under the US CLOUD Act, US authorities can compel US-headquartered companies to disclose customer data stored anywhere in the world — including EU data centres. The tiers below reflect each platform's legal exposure.

PlatformExposure tierScore (0–100)Basis
EuroComplySovereign8EU-incorporated entity, EU-only infrastructure (Supabase Frankfurt, Vercel EU, Mistral Paris)
DrataUS-Only88US-headquartered (San Diego) — CLOUD Act applies to all compliance data stored.

Tiers: Sovereign ≤20 · Mixed 21–50 · US-Dominant 51–80 · US-Only 81–100. Scores are EuroComply research estimates, not legal opinions.

Try EuroComply free

No credit card needed. Run your first compliance scan in 2 minutes.

Check your regulations — free

Next step — compare

See your vendor's CLOUD Act score

Check how Drata and other SaaS vendors score on CLOUD Act exposure — independently scored by EuroComply.

See your vendor's CLOUD Act score

Other comparisons

vs OneTrust

Enterprise privacy management platform

vs Kertos

European compliance automation platform

vs Vanta

Trust management platform

vs TrustArc

Enterprise privacy management and compliance

vs Securiti.ai

AI-powered data governance and privacy operations

vs BigID

Data intelligence for privacy, security, and governance

vs Osano

Privacy management for growing companies

vs Termly

Compliance documents and cookie consent for SMBs

vs iubenda

Legal compliance solutions for websites and apps

vs Didomi

Consent and preference management platform

vs Usercentrics

Consent management platform for GDPR and ePrivacy

vs Cookiebot by Usercentrics

Cookie consent and tracking compliance

vs Secureframe

Automated security compliance for SOC 2 and ISO 27001

vs Tugboat Logic by OneTrust

Security assurance and compliance readiness platform

vs Hyperproof

Compliance operations platform for GRC teams

vs AuditBoard

Audit, risk, and compliance management platform

vs LogicGate

Risk cloud for integrated risk management

vs MetricStream

Connected GRC for enterprise risk and compliance

vs Wiz

Cloud security platform

vs Lacework

Data-driven cloud security

vs Fairo

AI governance and compliance for the EU AI Act

vs Credo AI

AI governance for responsible AI deployment

vs Holistic AI

Enterprise AI risk management

vs Fairly AI

Automated AI governance and risk management

vs Saidot

Responsible AI management system

vs Trustible

AI governance for teams building and deploying AI

vs Lumenova AI

AI accountability and explainability platform

vs Prevalent

Third-party risk management platform

vs ProcessUnity

Vendor risk management and third-party governance

Comparison based on publicly available information as of April 2026. Pricing and features may have changed.