Consent Management Platforms (CMPs)
Cookiebot vs Iubenda
Both Cookiebot and Iubenda are EU-headquartered consent management platforms. Cookiebot (now part of Usercentrics) focuses tightly on cookie banners, scanning, and IAB TCF support. Iubenda offers a broader privacy stack β banners, privacy policy generation, and contract management β at a lower entry-point price.
How does Cookiebot compare to Iubenda?
Both Cookiebot and Iubenda are EU-headquartered consent management platforms. Cookiebot (now part of Usercentrics) focuses tightly on cookie banners, scanning, and IAB TCF support. Iubenda offers a broader privacy stack β banners, privacy policy generation, and contract management β at a lower entry-point price.
- Headquarters: Cookiebot β Copenhagen, Denmark (Usercentrics group); Iubenda β Bologna, Italy (Team.blue group)
- Core product: Cookiebot β Cookie banner + scanner + TCF v2.2 support; Iubenda β Banner + privacy policy + ToS + DPA generator
- Entry-level price: Cookiebot β Free tier; paid from ~β¬10/mo; Iubenda β Free tier; paid from β¬27.99/yr
- Languages supported: Cookiebot β 40+; Iubenda β 9 (banner & policy languages)
- IAB TCF v2.2: Cookiebot β Yes β Google-certified CMP partner; Iubenda β Yes
Why this comparison matters
Cookiebot and Iubenda show up together in almost every EU consent-management RFP because they sit on opposite ends of the same market. Cookiebot is the deeper, narrower tool β purpose-built around cookie banners, automated site scanning, and IAB TCF v2.2 β and that depth is reflected in its 40+ banner languages and Google-certified CMP status. Iubenda is the broader, lighter tool: a banner is one of four products it sells alongside privacy-policy generation, terms-of-service drafting, and contract management. The right answer depends almost entirely on where consent sits in your compliance budget. If your team already has lawyers drafting policies and the only missing piece is a TCF-grade banner that survives a GDPR audit by a Nordic or DACH regulator, Cookiebot's narrow focus is a feature. If your team is a four-person SaaS with no in-house legal and you need a banner + policy + ToS bundled under one invoice for under β¬30/year, Iubenda's breadth is the feature. Both are EU-headquartered, both host in the EU, and both have IAB TCF v2.2 certification β so the GDPR baseline is equivalent. What's not equivalent is the price ladder (Cookiebot's volume-tier pricing climbs fast for large sites) and the linguistic coverage (Iubenda's nine languages exclude most CEE markets). Above ~500k monthly visitors the two products diverge sharply on cost; below that, the spread is small and the breadth/depth trade-off dominates.
Feature comparison
| Attribute | Cookiebot | Iubenda |
|---|---|---|
| Headquarters | Copenhagen, Denmark (Usercentrics group) | Bologna, Italy (Team.blue group) |
| Core product | Cookie banner + scanner + TCF v2.2 support | Banner + privacy policy + ToS + DPA generator |
| Entry-level price | Free tier; paid from ~β¬10/mo | Free tier; paid from β¬27.99/yr |
| Languages supported | 40+ | 9 (banner & policy languages) |
| IAB TCF v2.2 | Yes β Google-certified CMP partner | Yes |
| Hosting region | EU (Denmark) | EU (Italy / managed cloud) |
| AI Act consent module | Not advertised as a distinct module | Not advertised as a distinct module |
Source: Cookiebot pricing page + Iubenda pricing page (vendor sites). Last reviewed: .
Verdict by use case
EU SaaS, < 100k monthly visitors, no in-house legal
Iubenda. The β¬27.99/yr entry tier covers banner + privacy policy + ToS in one subscription, which is cheaper and faster than buying a CMP and a policy tool separately.
Mid-market publisher, 1M+ monthly visitors, IAB TCF v2.2 required
Cookiebot. Deeper TCF tooling, Google-certified CMP status, and more granular vendor consent management make it the lower-risk choice when ad-tech revenue depends on the consent string.
Multi-region site covering CEE markets (PL, CZ, HU, RO)
Cookiebot. 40+ banner languages vs Iubenda's 9 means Cookiebot covers the full CEE footprint natively; with Iubenda you would need a custom-text workaround or a translation pass.
Migration considerations
Switching from Cookiebot to Iubenda is the more common direction (driven by cost at scale and the appeal of a bundled policy + banner under one subscription). The migration is mechanical: export your Cookiebot scan results, recreate consent categories in Iubenda's dashboard, swap the script tag, and verify the new banner renders in your top three locales. Cookiebot's site scanner produces a more detailed cookie inventory than Iubenda's, so plan a manual reconciliation pass β Iubenda will not auto-classify every cookie the same way. Going the other direction (Iubenda β Cookiebot) is typically driven by IAB TCF v2.2 depth or a Nordic-regulator audit demand: expect to re-author the privacy policy in your CMS or via a third-party tool, since Cookiebot doesn't replace Iubenda's policy generator. In both directions, the IAB TCF consent strings are interoperable β visitor consent collected by one CMP is recognised by the other once the script swap is live, so you don't lose the historical consent base. Watch for contract overlap: both vendors auto-renew annually unless you cancel 30 days before the renewal date.
Where does EuroComply fit?
Neither CMP currently advertises AI Act-specific consent surfaces (Article 50 transparency obligations, deepfake disclosure, biometric inference disclosure). Teams that need a single workspace for GDPR consent and AI Act transparency can pair their CMP with EuroComply β EuroComply does not replace the CMP, it adds the AI Act consent + obligation tracking on top.
EuroComply pricingFor informational purposes only. Pricing and feature details drift β verify on each vendor's site. Not legal, procurement, or financial advice.
Last reviewed: Β· Editorial policy