EuroComply
Zarejestruj się

EuroComply vs DataGuard

DataGuard is a Munich-based managed compliance service combining a software platform with outsourced Data Protection Officers and information security consultants. Its model is service-heavy, targeting DACH mid-market companies that want compliance delegated rather than self-managed.

EuroComply vs DataGuard — what is the difference?

EuroComply and DataGuard serve different compliance needs. EuroComply is built exclusively for EU SMEs, hosted on EU infrastructure (Frankfurt), powered by Mistral AI, and covers 20+ EU regulations including the AI Act — without CLOUD Act exposure. DACH mid-market companies (50–500 employees) preferring managed compliance over self-service software.

  • Self-serve — you own your compliance, no third-party dependency
  • Free tier to start; Pro at €149/month vs DataGuard's €500–1,500/month
  • EU AI Act and NIS-2 coverage — DataGuard's core gaps
  • DORA, CRA, DSA, Pay Transparency Directive coverage
Schrems II exposure (EuroComply)Sovereign (score: 8 — EU-only entity)
Schrems II exposure (DataGuard)Sovereign (score: 15)
EuroComply pricing€0 — €399/mo
DataGuard pricingService contract pricing: typically €6,000–18,000/year (billed monthly at €500–1,500/month); custom contracts for larger organisations
By: EuroComply Research Team, EU Compliance ResearchSource: EuroComply research, public sources (2026-05)Reviewed:

EuroComply

EU Compliance OS for SMEs

Pricing: €0 — €399/mo

For: EU SMEs (10-500 employees)

Self-serve — you own your compliance, no third-party dependency
Free tier to start; Pro at €149/month vs DataGuard's €500–1,500/month
EU AI Act and NIS-2 coverage — DataGuard's core gaps
DORA, CRA, DSA, Pay Transparency Directive coverage
No long-term contract required
Immediate access — no sales call or onboarding delay
20+ EU regulations in one dashboard, not just the legacy four

DataGuard

DPO-as-a-Service and managed privacy compliance

Pricing: Service contract pricing: typically €6,000–18,000/year (billed monthly at €500–1,500/month); custom contracts for larger organisations

For: DACH mid-market companies (50–500 employees) preferring managed compliance over self-service software

Strengths

Fully outsourced DPO service — no in-house expertise needed
ISO 27001 certification support included
Strong DACH brand recognition and track record since 2017
Combined software + human-expert model
BCM (business continuity management) tooling

Limitations

Service model means ongoing dependency on DataGuard's team
Higher cost — typically 4-10x EuroComply Pro pricing
No free tier or self-service evaluation
Limited EU AI Act coverage
Scope locked to GDPR + ISO 27001 + BCM — missing NIS-2, DORA, CRA
Requires contract commitment — no month-to-month plans

EuroComply vs DataGuard: what's the difference?

Under the US CLOUD Act, US authorities can compel US-headquartered companies to disclose customer data stored anywhere in the world — including EU data centres. The tiers below reflect each platform's legal exposure.

PlatformExposure tierScore (0–100)Basis
EuroComplySovereign8EU-incorporated entity, EU-only infrastructure (Supabase Frankfurt, Vercel EU, Mistral Paris)
DataGuardSovereign15German company (Munich, Germany) with EU-only legal structure. London office is a post-Brexit UK entity — no US CLOUD Act exposure. Customer data processed in EU.

Tiers: Sovereign ≤20 · Mixed 21–50 · US-Dominant 51–80 · US-Only 81–100. Scores are EuroComply research estimates, not legal opinions.

Try EuroComply free

No credit card needed. Run your first compliance scan in 2 minutes.

Check your regulations — free

Next step — compare

See your vendor's CLOUD Act score

Check how DataGuard and other SaaS vendors score on CLOUD Act exposure — independently scored by EuroComply.

See your vendor's CLOUD Act score

Frequently Asked Questions

Is DataGuard data stored in the EU?
Yes. DataGuard is rated Sovereign (CLOUD Act Exposure Score: 15/100). German company (Munich, Germany) with EU-only legal structure. London office is a post-Brexit UK entity — no US CLOUD Act exposure. Customer data processed in EU.
Is DataGuard subject to the US CLOUD Act?
DataGuard has a Sovereign CLOUD Act Exposure Score of 15/100, meaning US authorities have minimal legal basis to compel disclosure of EU customer data. German company (Munich, Germany) with EU-only legal structure. London office is a post-Brexit UK entity — no US CLOUD Act exposure. Customer data processed in EU.
What is the EU-sovereign alternative to DataGuard?
EuroComply is a Sovereign-rated (score: 8/100) EU compliance platform incorporated in Portugal (Code Tide Unipessoal LDA). It is hosted on Supabase AWS Frankfurt (eu-central-1) and Vercel EU Frankfurt, uses Mistral AI (French SAS) for AI inference, and is not subject to the US CLOUD Act. It covers 20+ EU regulations including the AI Act, GDPR, NIS2, DORA, and CRA for EU SMEs.
Which is better for EU SMEs: EuroComply or DataGuard?
EuroComply is purpose-built for EU SMEs (10–500 employees) with a free tier, EU-only infrastructure, and coverage of 20+ EU regulations in one platform. DataGuard DACH mid-market companies (50–500 employees) preferring managed compliance over self-service software. For teams that prioritise EU data sovereignty and multi-regulation compliance, EuroComply has a lower CLOUD Act exposure score (8 vs 15).

Other comparisons

vs OneTrust

Enterprise privacy management platform

vs Kertos

European compliance automation platform

vs Drata

Compliance automation for SOC 2 and ISO 27001

vs Vanta

Trust management platform

vs TrustArc

Enterprise privacy management and compliance

vs Securiti.ai

AI-powered data governance and privacy operations

vs BigID

Data intelligence for privacy, security, and governance

vs Osano

Privacy management for growing companies

vs Termly

Compliance documents and cookie consent for SMBs

vs iubenda

Legal compliance solutions for websites and apps

vs Didomi

Consent and preference management platform

vs Usercentrics

Consent management platform for GDPR and ePrivacy

vs Cookiebot by Usercentrics

Cookie consent and tracking compliance

vs Cookiebot vs Usercentrics

Both are EU-sovereign CMPs — the real question is scope

vs Secureframe

Automated security compliance for SOC 2 and ISO 27001

vs Tugboat Logic by OneTrust

Security assurance and compliance readiness platform

vs Hyperproof

Compliance operations platform for GRC teams

vs AuditBoard

Audit, risk, and compliance management platform

vs LogicGate

Risk cloud for integrated risk management

vs MetricStream

Connected GRC for enterprise risk and compliance

vs Wiz

Cloud security platform

vs Lacework

Data-driven cloud security

vs Fairo

AI governance and compliance for the EU AI Act

vs Credo AI

AI governance for responsible AI deployment

vs Holistic AI

Enterprise AI risk management

vs Fairly AI

Automated AI governance and risk management

vs Saidot

Responsible AI management system

vs Trustible

AI governance for teams building and deploying AI

vs Lumenova AI

AI accountability and explainability platform

vs Prevalent

Third-party risk management platform

vs ProcessUnity

Vendor risk management and third-party governance

vs heyData

German GDPR and AI Act compliance for SMEs

Comparison based on publicly available information as of April 2026. Pricing and features may have changed.